Search for: "Cox v. District of Columbia"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
October 12 The US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld Judge Sirica's ruling that Nixon should surrender tape recordings relevant to Watergate. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is in the bar section, where she will move the admission of a group in a few minutes. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
In the recent decision in Lyons v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Cox Brainerd Currie Professor of Law Duke University School of Law Lawrence A. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Cox, 477 So. 2d 963 (Ala. 1985), that failure by the plaintiff (as opposed to a prescribing physician) to read a drug label precluded any finding of causation:[N]othing in the nature of [defendant’s] inadequate warning prevented plaintiff from reading it. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) affirmed. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The question I’ve been asking in a series of recent posts is whether history can provide any insight into current claims that copyright law and the First Amendment conflict. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in Fisher v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
In the context of congressional oversight, the executive branch has thus largely been, as Cox wrote, “left to itself. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
The Second District reversed the trial court. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
District Court for the District of Columbia that seeks to rectify this problem. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
§ 194, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia has the “duty [] to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
Halbrook's book will be central to the Supreme Court case, just as Halbrook's previous work was for the Supreme Court's decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
Many of the other attorneys in this figure are well known to the court, yet several of the state government attorneys, including Loren AliKhan for the District of Columbia, David Franklin for Illinois and Matthew McGuire for Virginia, each argued their first cases before the court this term. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
