Search for: "Cox v. Louisiana"
Results 41 - 56
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 283 F.3d 254, 268 (5th Cir. 2002) (no need for separate warnings about what are “widely recognized to be possible outcomes”) (applying Louisiana law); Banner v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:07 pm
Cox Communications v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:40 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:49 am
KPMG (certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit) and Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:22 pm
Cox, 2010 U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
. – Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:34 am
Doug Cox, of Grove.Democratic Gov. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Schwab v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Louisiana, No. 06-10119 A Louisiana conviction for first-degree murder and death sentence is reversed where the trial judge committed clear error in its ruling on an objection to the prosecution's strike of a black juror during voir dire, in violation of Batson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
Louisiana; U.S. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
Cox, 170 S.W.3d 389 (Ky.2005); Fowler v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:11 am
Ed. 1031 (1942); see also Cox v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
No. 06-273, Cox v. [read post]
