Search for: "Cox v. Pennsylvania R. Co." Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Cox Professor of Law, The George Washington University --Robert Cover, Legal Pluralism, and the Possibility of a Jurisgenerative Jurisprudence Avi Soifer. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  As noted above, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court curiously denied allocatur.Jury Instructions in Post-Koken MattersContinuing on the topic of jury issues, Judge Terrence R. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  As noted above, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court curiously denied allocatur.Jury Instructions in Post-Koken MattersContinuing on the topic of jury issues, Judge Terrence R. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]