Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2011, 2:39 pm
Cox v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm
Cox, 2018 U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
Cox (Tribal Corporate Entities; Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Walker E. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:31 pm
V. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
Aug. 5, 2011); Cox v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm
Trump, NY State Supreme Court, Complaint, 11/4/2019 Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm
Trump, NY State Supreme Court, Complaint, 11/4/2019 Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm
Trump, NY State Supreme Court, Complaint, 11/4/2019 Carroll v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm
Trump, NY State Supreme Court, Complaint, 11/4/2019 Carroll v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 2:01 am
Cox v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
Cox Communications, Inc., 2020 WL 3121306 (E.D. [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:18 am
Cox, 2016 U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Reassigning individuals to perform duties alleged to be those of a position classified and allocated to a lower title and gradeAlston v Bertoni, 2016 NY Slip Op 02897, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAs the result of a perceived increase in criminal activity, Village of Endicott Mayor John Bertoni, directed Endicott Police Chief Michael Cox to assign detectives to police patrol duties. [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:00 am
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
Sehl v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
” Allen Cox v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:39 pm
Further, a conviction for endangering the welfare of a child under Penal Law section 260.10(1) conclusively establishes a lack of moral integrity" CONTRACTS, JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE Cox v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:42 am
The court also references the New Jersey state court Donato case from 2005. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
*A United States District Court judge granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Matthews had spoken as a public employee and not as a citizen and thus his speech was not protected by the First Amendment.Citing Cox v Warwick Valley Central School District, 654 F3d 267, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said that the test it applied in cases in which a plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation claim requires the plaintiff to establish that: (1)… [read post]