Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria), heard 20 – 21 January 2014. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am
No benefit the state may assert can outweigh the countervailing public interest in protecting consumers. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:41 am
Veterans Land Board of the State of Texas (VLB), et al., No. 09? [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
Cox New Jersey Appeals Court Reverses Anti-Harassment Order Based on Emails – E.L. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:32 am
Cox & Jerome C. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
City of New York, 779 F.3d 167, [quoting Cox v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
City of New York, 779 F.3d 167, [quoting Cox v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria), heard 20 – 21 January 2014. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:50 am
However, in Cox v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
See Davis & Cox v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:24 am
The second case was Cox v NAP Constr. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Cox (that was summarily affirmed by the Supreme Court) seemed to eliminate a safe harbor previously thought to have been granted to state legislators under one person, one vote. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 6:17 am
Chevron Corp ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:43 am
Defense in a recent trip-and-fall premises liability lawsuit argued a defect in a doorway that reportedly caused a patron to trip was not unreasonably dangerous, and further pointed to a so-called "categorical exemption" regarding entryway thresholds under state law. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:08 pm
The appeals court agreed with the Michigan attorney general, Republican Mike Cox, who said in a March 2005 opinion that same-sex benefits are not allowed in a state that does not recognize same-sex unions.Thanks to How Appealing, here is the Michigan opinion in National Pride v. [read post]