Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,041
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 1:25 pm
In Watts v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:57 am
” Gilligan, Will & Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 9:40 pm
(“V-One”) in June 2005. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:50 am
The state dismissed the conspiracy charge. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:20 am
See Cox v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:26 pm
By Erica Shelley Nelson and Kasey Burton In Cox v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:59 am
–State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
Cox & Cristina M. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:30 am
” (Reno v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:46 am
At least 10 transgender women of color have been murdered in the United States since June. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:56 am
Cox, No. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:56 am
Cox, No. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Cox case has been understood to prevent state and local redistricting plans with deviations from strict population equality done for bad reasons, such as to help one’s political party. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:13 pm
" The case of People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:13 pm
" The case of People v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
We also know that the President (the chief law enforcement officer of the United States) announced last February that there has not been a “smidgen of corruption” even though neither he nor the Department of Justice could have examined all the evidence, in particular the emails and other electronic information. [read post]
