Search for: "Cox v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 1,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 12:45 pm by Unknown
"A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study on Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge and Access to Services of Arab and Kurdish Syrian Refugee Young Women Living in an Urban Setting in Lebanon," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 18 (Sept. 2021) [open access] - Authors (3) = Germany Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Shalini Bhargava Ray
In its decision, the Sixth Circuit expressed skepticism about the states’ standing to bring suit, the reviewability of the Mayorkas memorandum under the APA, and the merits of the states’ substantive claims. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 and refused permission to appeal. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:02 am by Stephanie Pell
” They are able to “come into the United States and rapidly use an internet service provider, come up and do their activities and take that down before a warrant can be issued, before we can actually have surveillance by a civilian authority here in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In today’s column, I criticize its reliance on the views of liberal scholars.In a single paragraph, Justice Alito cites John Hart Ely, Archibald Cox, Laurence Tribe, Mark Tushnet, Philip Bobbitt, and Akhil Amar for the proposition that the reasoning of Roe v. [read post]