Search for: "Cox v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 1,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2022, 9:07 am by Eric Goldman
States continue to legislate as if Section 230 (and the First Amendment) doesn’t exist, and states are also lining up behind legal challenges to undercut Section 230 expressly or indirectly. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm by INFORRM
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926,  which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
No benefit the state may assert can outweigh the countervailing public interest in protecting consumers. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States (Artist: Gardener Cox) The Oyez site reports that Congressional leaders, especially those from the South, were worried about the potential of a liberal justice being appointed to the Court following the landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:37 am by Jennifer Davis
Resources Cox, Archibald. (1968) The Warren Court: Constitutional Decision as an Instrument of Reform. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Cox Professor of Law, The George Washington University --Robert Cover, Legal Pluralism, and the Possibility of a Jurisgenerative Jurisprudence Avi Soifer. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Activists are exasperated that members of Congress and President Biden have not been able to push through federal legislation that would supersede the voting laws moving through state Legislatures across the country. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Both of these issues were addressed by Washington State Supreme Court in Putman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
New online from Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: From Disestablishment to Dartmouth College v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]