Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm
From Tuesday's Georgia Court of Appeals opinion by Judge Clyde Reese in ACLU v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 12:06 pm
McCormick v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 8:08 pm
Cox and People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
United States v Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 [82] Ms. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
The first of the two cases—40 Main Street Offices, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the venue, timing… [read post]
9 May 2020, 10:33 pm
Myers v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
” Never, but apparently, not for long.On June 20 of last year, in Gundy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
State Col [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Name: Ryan V. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:01 am
While Napster was eventually shut down (and later brought back), the issues of downloading music on P2P networks persist, and was the reason for a court case in the US where the jury gave an unprecedented damages reward.The case of Sony Music Entertainment v Cox Communications Inc is a class action lawsuit where Sony and other music companies alleged that Cox Communications did not stop ongoing copyright infringement after receiving notice of the alleged behavior. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am
Alphabet https://t.co/DwhCwysLC2 2020-03-17 Another Troubling Courtroom Loss for Online Marketplaces–Massachusetts Port Authority v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am
Alphabet https://t.co/DwhCwysLC2 2020-03-17 Another Troubling Courtroom Loss for Online Marketplaces–Massachusetts Port Authority v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:11 am
In Cox v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
