Search for: "Cox v. State of New York et al" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2018, 6:48 am by Jadzia Pierce
Covington represented Samsung in this case (White, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  New York:  Cambridge University Press, 2012. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Following Recent Cases in Media Law at the European Court of Human Rights, van der Hof et al. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am by New Books Script
Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2011 xxx, 991 p. ; 26 cm. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Prince asked the Southern District of New York court to dismiss the case with prejudice as it was an attempt to ‘essentially re-litigate’ his controversial fair use victory against another photographer Patrick Cariou. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
Now, Kat Neil analyses the recent report by Nobel laureate Professor Joseph Stiglitz et al in which the alternatives to the patent system are explored: Alternative ways for financing and incentivizing research: a Nobel laureate and his colleagues state their case. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
The change was sparked by a decision by a federal judge in New York who ruled that the key verse in the song was not protected under copyright for lack of originality. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
., Furby et al., 1989; Harris, Rice, & Quinsey, 1998; Polizzi, MacKenzie, & Hickman, 1999). [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  Acknowledging changing societal perceptions about homosexual conduct, which long ago was against the law in New York, Justice Rumsey nonetheless sai [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:12 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
That topic has been popular theme from readers of our prior blog postings - especially on EEOC o/b/o Serrano, et al v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Owens-Illinois, Inc., et al., No. 8704-1464 (Philadelphia Cty. [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]