Search for: "Cox v. Texas"
Results 1 - 20
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 12:21 pm
The case is believed to be among the first to seek court approval since Roe v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
The court in Cox v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:05 am
The opinion is styled, Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:53 pm
Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Tiye Foley, Michael Ritter, and Ryan V. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:07 am
Karsan is also a plaintiff in Zurawski v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:20 pm
NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 6:45 am
Texas Department of Public Safety v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:20 pm
SOURCE: HOUSTON COURT OF APPEALS - No. 01-12-00879-CV - 3/7/2013 [1] The underlying case is KNG, L.L.C. d/b/a Texas Direct Bindery & Letterpress v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:20 pm
SOURCE: HOUSTON COURT OF APPEALS - No. 01-12-00879-CV - 3/7/2013 [1] The underlying case is KNG, L.L.C. d/b/a Texas Direct Bindery & Letterpress v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:17 pm
Pradnya Joshi of The Washington Post reports that “Texas judge allows abortion in Cox case as AG Paxton threatens legal action; The case is believed to be among the first to seek court approval since Roe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
–NetChoice v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:36 am
To bypass the highly relevant Herbert v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:17 am
In the case Gevo v. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Name: Ryan V. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:35 am
Here is a story from Law.Com about how Texas handles executor-estate attorney legal malpractice cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:45 am
The day Cox received the terrible news about her fetus, the Texas Supreme Court was hearing oral arguments in Zurawski v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Tiye Foley, Michael Ritter, and Ryan V. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:55 am
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:24 am
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]