Search for: "Craig v. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith that "an individual's religious beliefs" do not "excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 6:09 am
Miller (University of Iowa College of Law), on Monday, February 26, 2018 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Buyouts, Delaware law, DGCL Section 102, Director liability, Duty of care, Fiduciary duties, In re Revlon, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Smith v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:03 am by William Montgomery
[v][vi] This statistic alone highlights the most significant driver of the massive industry growth: people enjoy watching other people play video games, and are willing to pay to have a quality experience. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:10 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
It has always been up to the government to regulate these forms; as stated by the Supreme Court yet again from Smith v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am by Jamie Baker
Craig Smith & Tom Melsheimer, Open Courts the Role of Rule 76a in Our Civil Justice System, 80 TEX. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm by Dale Carpenter
Smith (striking down Arkansas’ “disparate treatment” of married gay couples in listing parents on birth certificates). [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In Craig v Slater, a proceeding heard recently over four weeks by Toogood J (sitting without a jury), two pre-trial decisions are of note. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:17 am
 Studies show that women get interrupted more (no matter how senior), passed over for promotions and raises (even though entitled) and reviewed negatively for similar traits celebrated and promoted in men (bossy v leadership, arrogant v confident, etc). [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
We draw attention to the judgment in the case of Williams v Craig [2017] NZHC 724 – setting aside the jury’s damages award of $1.27m and ordering a retrial. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
And in early December, Justice Woolford dismissed the long-running case of Wu v Moncur. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a Guardian Comment piece Joan Smith argued that the Mahmood conviction demonstrated the urgent need for Leveson Part 2. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  BACKGROUND   Last week the SEC issued a settled administrative order finding that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (now rebranded as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management) failed to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:00 pm
” The SEC recently announced similar cease-and-desist proceedings under Regulation S-P against broker-dealer Craig Scott Capital, LLC and two of its principals. [read post]