Search for: "Crane v. New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2016, 6:19 am
Recently, the New York Court of Appeals – the highest court in that state – took on this issue in Dummitt v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 10:57 am
According to a recent news feature form the Daily News, a Massachusetts man who suffered a broken back and skull fracture has filed a lawsuit against the New York City Building Department. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 6:12 am
Additional Resources: Officials look for cause of deadly NYC crane collapse, February 6, 2016, CBS News, by News Desk More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:09 pm
At the beginning of this year, a crane collapsed in the Queens borough of New York City, injuring seven people. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
Varganyi is a former mechanic for New York Crane. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:04 am
In McCoy v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 10:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:00 am
New York City Tr. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
A recent poll conducted by Crane’s New York finds public opinion mixed on which of these two court decisions is better for New York City. [read post]
4 May 2006, 11:57 am
John Crane Inc., et al.; Estate of Noah Pride v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 3:00 am
City of New York raises some extremely interesting issues. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:47 pm
This week, though, in Midler v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:55 am
" On March 2, 2010 The New York Appellate Division,1st. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 2:11 pm
Centre Lane v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:02 pm
Joy Contractors, Inc., regarding a claim for additional insured coverage by New York Crane & Equipment Company pursuant to its lease agreement with Joy Contractors. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 2:11 pm
Centre Lane v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 2:11 pm
Centre Lane v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm
The elevation differential cannot be considered de minimis when the weight of the object being hoisted is capable of generating an extreme amount of force, even though it only traveled a short distance (see Runner v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 13 NY3d 599 [2009]; see also Wilinski v 334 E. 92nd Hous. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:04 am
The New York State Court of Appeals has ruled that additional insureds are not entitled to coverage under a general liability policy if that policy is rescinded due to the named insured’s material misrepresentations.The coverage dispute, captioned Admiral Insurance Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
This post examines a recent opinion from the Supreme Court, Genesee County, New York: Vega v. [read post]
