Search for: "Crane v. New York" Results 21 - 40 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2009, 2:43 am
Metroplitan Transportation Authority Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTYCivil Practice City Fails to Satisfy Requirements For Personal, In Rem Jurisdiction; Nuisance Abatement Action Dismissed City of New York v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
The Motor Vehicle Accident, Death and TextingThis post examines a recent opinion the Supreme Court -Genesee County, New York issued in a civil case: Vega v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:44 am
Recently the Supreme Court of New York decided the crucial question of whether there was a dispute in the material facts of the case. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  We look at FTI Consulting, Inc. v CT Miami, LLC  2018 NY Slip Op 31923(U)  August 6, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654062/2016  Judge: Melissa A. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Spiegel v Ahearn  2018 NY Slip Op 32472(U)  October 1, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 101251/2016  Judge: Melissa A. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:34 am by Schachtman
Juni sued multiple defendants in New York Supreme Court, for New York County. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:19 pm by Daniel E. Katz
The plans in question were approved after a two-year review process by the New York City Department of Buildings. [read post]
16 May 2007, 1:19 am
Greater New York Mutual Insurance Co., defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawLandlord Granted Money Judgment Against One Tenant, Judgment of Possession Against Others 152 W. realty LLC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:00 am
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Charges Regarding Crane Dismantling Stand Against Defendants; Statutes Not Unconstitutionally Vague People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Digeser, is a 25% shareholder of two New York corporations, Gould Erectors & Rigging, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:38 am by Gene Killian
The New York Court of Appeals (New York’s highest court) found that the crane qualified, because the crane was supposed to be removed when the project was over, and the installation and disassembly of the crane were “incidental” to the construction. [read post]