Search for: "Cravens v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
This is also apparent from Article 7, which states that the Directive shall not affect the right of member states “to apply or introduce laws, regulations or administrative provisions which are more favourable to employees. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:17 pm
(Indeed, ironically enough, Rust v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
And after talking about State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:29 pm
(If you won't believe me, then read Richard Posner's great opinion in Walker v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
We also had a post on the hearing itself by Edward Craven. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Bruen and West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Baloco v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Coogan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:45 am
(The student who was arrested, and two others who scuffled with the store owner, later plead guilty and stated that no racial profiling had been involved.) [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:59 am
At The University of Chicago Law School, Ginsburg stated on the 40th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
The same blog also notes the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant permission to appeal in the case of Craven v Information Commissioner & DECC, permission to appeal. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:08 am
Wheaton v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am
This argument was founded on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN, which concerned systematic phone hacking by journalists from the Mirror Group. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
