Search for: "Creative Management Services, LLC v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2017, 7:32 pm by Nikki Siesel
Creative Harbor, LLC (“Creative Harbor”) filed its intent-to-use application on February 19, 2014. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Kaufhold - Guest
In contrast, the Supreme Court has consistently declined  – most recently in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV… [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 9:27 pm by Law Insider
Watts is a former Criminal and Defense Law Specialist with the United States Army. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:20 am
  Judge Elizabeth Magner, in McCain v Ocwen, ______________, stated that the evidence adduced i [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:47 am by Eric Goldman
” Plus, “The allegedly infringing images was stored on Valuewalk’s server in the United States, was accessible from computers within the United States, and its use was directed towards United States readers. [read post]
 With the looming uncertainty of the FTC’s restitution and disgorgement authority in light of the Supreme Court’s consideration of AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
The court found that the piece in question, a review of anti-counterfeit regulations, “possesses a creative quality, epitomised by originality and novelty” because the work was "“the result of a personal, original, new and creative elaboration of legal concepts and industry practices and of the experiences of the author”. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:55 am by Rob Robinson
ILTA 2012 – (@OrangeLT) eDiscovery: The Growing Cost of Compliance (PDF) (ESG Global) Judge Scheindlin’s Collection Case and Florida eDiscovery Amendments  – (Legal Talk Network) Inc. 5000:Fastest Growing Companies By Industry, State and Metro Area (Interactive InfoGraphic) – (@OrangeLT) Ouch! [read post]