Search for: "Crews v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 504
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:47 am by Mark Murakami
It asserted that the United States was negligent for putting an "incompetent" crew on the Navy small boat.  [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia found the FEC regulation 11 CFR §109.10(e)(1)(vi), did not comport with the statutory disclosure requirements of 52 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:43 am by Jim Walker
The crew member underwent extensive and painful medical treatment in the burn units of West Jefferson Medical Center and Baton Rouge General Medical Center in Louisiana, U.S.A. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 12:18 am by Peter Hirtle
The most important part of the report are found in Part IV, where Crews describes the evolution and importance of reserves in libraries, and Part V, where he discusses the legal basis for ereserves. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
For the sovereign immunity argument, the State cited to the Supreme Court of the United States’ decision in Alden v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:24 pm by Richard M. Re
United States, and it's a weird one. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Maritime Law Staff
It is days like today that makes me proud to be a member of the United States Navy and this coalition. [read post]
23 Jul 2006, 7:56 pm by The Owens Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
The Fifth Circuit hears appeals from the United States District Courts and the several state appellate courts in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:54 am
The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held crew members may seek punitive damages in personal injury claims if they can prove the ship owner's misconduct in causing a ship to become unseaworthy was willful, wanton or reckless. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a commercial fisherman can be convicted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s “anti-shredding” provision for ordering his crew to throw seventy-two undersized fish overboard, dominated coverage of the Court. [read post]