Search for: "Crews v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 10:52 am
  Crazy.So when I saw that this opinion was about someone who'd been prosecuted by the U.S. military, and then by the United States, I thought:  "Oh. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
§243(1)(b) of the Military Law provides, in relevant part, that military duty includes "service in the merchant marine which shall consist of service as an officer or member of the crew on or in connection with a vessel . . . owned by, chartered to, or operated by or for the account or use of the government of the United States . . . and who served satisfactorily as a crew member during the period of armed conflict [December 17, 1941]to August 15, 1945]… [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Anastasia Bradatan
Therefore, Gul asserted that the United States had lost the authority to detain him at all. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:54 am
"These are the conditions that prevailed for the nearly full month that it took to move these detainees by slow boat to the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:04 pm
State, 317 Ark. 414, 878 S.W.2d 717 (1994) (citing United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am by Adam Wagner
British Airways Plc v Unite the Union Queen’s Bench Division, 17 May 2010 – Read judgment Update (07/06/20) – this decision was reversed by the Court of Appeal on 20/05/10. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:23 pm by Nigel Stacey
Between 2000 and 2014, overboard falls were the second leading cause of death among commercial fishermen in the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 6:15 am
That conclusion is supported by United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:11 am by Trevor Cutaiar
On August 5, 2015, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Glaze v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:42 am by Will Baude
But a few things interested me on today’s list: – A grant in United States v. [read post]