Search for: "Cropper v. United States" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that  “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:15 pm by Matt Danzer
The second day of the week-long hearing in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm by cdw
In favor of the State &/or Warden (Notable) United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:09 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On November 6, in a not for publication opinion, Judge White found that the second amended complaint was also deficient under the standards set forth in the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:39 pm
’…An individual is held ‘in custody’ by the United States when the United States official charged with his detention has ”the power to produce’ him,” citing an 1855 decision. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 2:03 am
According to the Washington Post, the disturbing case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 6:27 am
The Whiteside case arises from an incident that occurred at Camp Cropper in Iraq on 31 December 2006. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:48 am
The United States and other allied countries conquered and now occupy and control Japan. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 6:29 am
That judge read recent Supreme Court precedents differently, saying "the one constant in all these cases is that the petitioners were in the custody of the United States alone, in its capacity as the United States, and not by any multinational force. [read post]