Search for: "Cross v. Evans" Results 1 - 20 of 338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2007, 10:38 am
Evans contends this diminution of the State's burden unfairly prejudiced him.The trial judge was prompted to give the questioned instruction by the cross-examination of one of the detectives, which inquired as to specific investigative techniques that were not used in this case. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Evan Fox-Decent (McGill University - Faculty of Law) has posted The Charter and Administrative Law: Cross-Fertilization in Public Law (ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN CONTEXT, C. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Philip Thomas
Last week Jones County Circuit Court Judge Billy Joe Landrum awarded over $12.5 million in attorney's fees and expenses in the Evans v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 11:39 am by WSLL
CROSS, husband and wife, Proposed Road No. 276: WAYNE CURTIS ALTAFFER v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Toby Lovett, Olswang LLP
Mr Evans applied for a judicial review of the issuance of this certificate. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:20 am by Barry Sookman
In a recent decision of the English and Wales Court of Appeal in Evans, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 139 (14 February 201), the accused, Mr Evans, was convicted of two offences of distributing infringing copies of musical works and was sentenced to 12 months in prison for these crimes. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:59 pm by South Florida Lawyers
Here's the key holding: We first [consider] Du Pont's consolidation issue raised on cross-appeal. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:54 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Stephen Hut (best known to the No Man and me for his win that derailed Maryland’s death penalty in Evans v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm by WIMS
The parties cross-appealed as to the holdback issues and insurance premium setoff. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Aleksandra & Ljiljana Gacic & Branislav Ciric v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd & Matthew Evans ([2015] NSWCA 99) the NSW Court of Appeal increased the $160,000 damages awarded to each of three former restaurateurs defamed by a Sydney Morning Herald review twelve years ago. [read post]