Search for: "Cross v. Shell Oil Co"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
” The Oil Companies contracted to have McColl, a former Shell engineer, dump the waste at property in Fullerton, California. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 340 (1997)). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Supreme Court decision in Robinson v Shell Oil Co., wherein the court found that the term “employer” in Title VII encompassed former employers. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:57 am
Cochran v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:36 am
Shell Oil Co., 2021 WL 1232694 (S.D. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
The parties briefs can be viewed by following the hotlinks on the Texas Supreme Court’s docket for Hill v Shamoun.483 S.W.3d 767 (2016)SHAMOUN & NORMAN, LLP, Appellant and Cross-Appelleev.Albert G. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm
[#Air] GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)House Committee Approves Pipeline & Boiler, Cement MACT BillsEPA Issues Shell Air Permits For Arctic Sea Drilling; Enviros ObjectGOP Presses DOE On Solyndra; Execs Take The 5thDOE Touts Jobs & Advances In Weatherization & Green EnergyTechnology Roadmap On CCS In Industrial Applications Minard Run Oil Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
: TianRui Group Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 12:56 am
Shell Oil Co., 425 F.3d 1366 (Fed. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Hawkes Co., No. 15-290, 578 U.S. ____ (May 31, 2016). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Hawkes Co., No. 15-290, 578 U.S. ____ (May 31, 2016). [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Supreme Court General Electric Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Grace & Co. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:31 pm
As an example, she pointed to the Royal Dutch Shell settlement in the Netherlands. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
The transition from shell to metal: beads fashioned from copper (dark) and from Spondylus (spiny oyster) shells (light). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:58 am
” The court noted that in Robinson v Shell Oil Co, the Supreme Court construed “employees” as defined in Title VII to include both current and former employees because the definition lacked a “temporal qualifier. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),IBM patents and defensive publishing: (Securing Innovation),Stockholm Network paper on developing nations and pharmaceutical patents: (IPcentral Weblog),Good and bad news for the IP industry if recession does bite: (IAM),Business Software Alliance: Piracy economic impact is tens of billions of dollars: (Ars Technica),IP portfolio costs - when less is more: (IP ThinkTank),IP protection: Competitive market default: (The Fire… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
”[15] One such example is the landmark $352 million Royal Dutch Shell settlement, which arose from allegations by European investors that Shell overstated its oil and gas reserves.[16] As such, the Netherlands might be the new “place to [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm
”[1] Did Judge Milazzo engage in judicial dodging with rejecting the relevancy argument and emphasizing the truism that Sanofi could highlight the discrepancy on cross-examination? [read post]
