Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 16,509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 6:31 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Improper cross-examination by state — Nolle prossed charges Arnillo Parks, appellant, appeals his convictions in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for first- and second-degree assault upon Kendria Long and reckless endangerment of Kendria Long and K.P. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:49 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Confrontation clause — Limit placed on cross-examination of state’s witness Derrick Herndon (“Appellant”) was indicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County for attempted first-degree murder, attempted second-degree murder, firstdegree assault, use of a firearm in a crime of violence, reckless endangerment, firearm possession with a felony conviction, and illegal possession ... [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:31 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Cross examination by defense — Impeachment In this criminal case, Aaron Green, appellant, presents one evidentiary question for our review: Did the trial court restrict improperly the cross-examination of a material witness in the case? [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 4:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Ct.): State v Garrison Included in the file as an appendix is the cross-dep agreement between Tulalip Tribes and Snohomish County. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:44 pm by Liskow & Lewis
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the American Lung Association in the litigation involving EPA’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (“CSAPR”). [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
Regina (Al-Sweady and Others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Full disclosure was required in any judicial review proceedings involving disputed questions of fact so that effective and proper cross-examination of the makers of witness statements on those questions could take place. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am by Josh Wright
  But the DOJ’s recent announcement of case against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan looks like the DOJ’s first major “exclusionary” conduct case — despite the fact that it is brought under Section of the Sherman Act rather than Section 2 (there is also a state antitrust law claim). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:07 am by Marci Hamilton
The Nones are not likely to buy the duplicitous argument that a cross is nonreligious. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:41 pm
  Via Eugene Volokh, the issue arose in a California case, People v. [read post]