Search for: "Crowe v. State of South Dakota"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 9:35 am
Indeed, the list of Section 5 jurisdictions is bizarre: six states of the Old Confederacy (and certain counties in three others), plus Alaska, Arizona, and counties or townships in other states ranging from New Hampshire to South Dakota. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Hitchcock and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:34 pm
” Crow v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:07 am
Southern States with Jim Crow histories are still relying on moral turpitude laws and the Shelby v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Here’s a bit of history, mostly from my reading of United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
Box 308 Faribault, MN 55021-0308 Phone: (507) 332-5491 (V/TTY); (800) 657-3936 (V/TTY/Toll Free) DEAF, Inc. 413 Wacouta Street Suite 300 St. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
” Frustration and Persistence for Activists on the 56th Anniversary of the Voting Rights MSN – Vanessa Williams (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The 1965 Voting Rights Act is considered the most significant achievement of the civil rights movement because it removed Jim Crow-era laws that blocked the vast majority of Black people from voting, especially in the South. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The decision by the United States to support the Declaration was the result of a thorough review of the Declaration by the relevant federal agencies.1 In conducting its review of the Declaration, U.S. agencies consulted extensively with tribal leaders during three rounds of consultations, one in Rapid City, South Dakota, and two in Washington, D.C. [read post]
