Search for: "Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2015, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. (2003) 30 Cal.4th 303, the California Supreme Court held that statutory claims for public injunctive relief are not subject to compulsory private arbitration. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc., 30 Cal.4th 303 (2003), which extended this holding to the UCL and FAL. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Pacificare Health Systems, Inc., 30 Cal.4th 303, 312 (2003), in which the Supreme Court strongly suggested that "public injunctions" may be ordered under the CLRA without class certification. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 4:03 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc., 30 Cal. 4th 303 (2003), which held that public injunctive relief claims are not arbitrable as a matter of California public policy, in the CLRA and UCL contexts, respectively. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:44 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc., 30 Cal. 4th 303 (2003), for the proposition that a claim for injunctive relief under the Unfair Business Practices Act is not arbitrable (see Hoover at 19), is notable in that in Iskanian, the Second Appellate District had arguably deemed Cruz overruled (see Iskanian slip op. at 16-17). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am by Matt C. Bailey
PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc., 30 Cal. 4th 303 (2003) remained valid law not withstanding Concepcion:The Court has also reviewed subsequent authority submitted by the parties and the Court is not convinced that Cruz and Broughton are overruled by Concepcion.Both Cruz and Broughton are more nuanced in their holdings than an "outright" prohibition of certain claims. [read post]