Search for: "Cruz v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 783
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Ct. 1201 (2012)), which seemingly puts state-created unconscionability doctrine outside the ambit of FAA preemption, before the proceedings focused on Cruz and Broughton. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am by Arthur F. Coon
Such are the fundamental philosophical lessons of the Sixth District Court of Appeal’s recently published opinion in Save Our Big Trees v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Horton is wrong and that Hoover is distinguishable on Broughton-Cruz for the reasons stated in Nelsen.   [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:24 pm by Cal Law
Cruz’s legal team is led by Shanta Driver of Michigan-based By Any Means Necessary, a coalition that agitated in support of affirmative action in Grutter v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Bagley on Tuesday, May 22, and United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am by David Cruz
Cruz, Professor of Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm by Nikki Siesel
The New Santa Cruz Surf School, LLC (“Applicant”) filed an application with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for the mark SANTA CRUZ SURF SCHOOL in standard characters. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Maintaining "an attachment to the labor market" for the purposes of eligibility for workers’ compensation benefits Cruz v Buffalo Bd. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 03034, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe New York State Workers’ Compensation Board requires that a claimant for benefits have “an attachment to the labor market” if he or she is seeking to receive partial disability benefits when he or she cannot perform the normal duties of… [read post]