Search for: "Cunningham v. California" Results 21 - 40 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
Cunningham provides a big boost in two areas of current and future Ninth Circuit rehearings en banc.In Cunningham, the Court addressed the California state sentencing system, which permits a sentence at the high end of a guideline based upon certain findings. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:08 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in three cases Monday, including Cunningham v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
In Cunningham, the Supremes applied Blakely to California's guideline sentencing scheme. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 2:55 pm
This morning, The Associated Press reported that the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court Jan. 22 decided 2 cases related to the criminal justice system: In Cunningham v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:10 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Wednesday in Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
  It starts with this notable sentence: "The California sentencing law that the Court strikes down today is indistinguishable in any constitutionally significant respect from the advisory Guidelines scheme that the Court approved in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 5:57 pm
The California Supreme Court — acting only 16 days after the nation's highest court humbled it with Jan. 22's Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the majority in Cunningham v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:47 pm by Art Hinshaw
  We’ve had lots of commentary on the case on this blog (see Sternlight here , Cunningham here, and the Daily Labor Report here), and my prediction is that Concepcion wins because the California law in [...] [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 7:50 am
Supreme Court Order List: If you make it past more than 35 pages of GVR's based on Cunningham v. [read post]