Search for: "Cunningham v. California" Results 61 - 80 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
California (2007) 549 U.S.__ [127 S.Ct. 856] (Cunningham), compelling reduction of the sentence to the midterm. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:54 am
[Posted by Ron Wright] The Cunningham case settled the applicability of Blakely to the largest "hold-out" state, California. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
  Though much can be said about the substance of the arguments--particularly Cunningham v. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 11:00 am by Howard Friedman
Certain other claims were dismissed.In Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The opinion of the Court in California v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" Then, Chief Judge Lippman wrote that there is no material difference between the California statute struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]) "and our persistent felony offender sentencing statutes. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm by Jon Sands
  These facts easily supported both the assault and child-endangerment convictions.After Cunningham v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:41 pm
The primary issue before us is whether, in light of Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]), this sentencing scheme violates Apprendi and defendant's due process and Sixth Amendment rights. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
  The Ninth Circuit thus noted that only the Seventh and Eleventh Circuits in Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:01 pm
Sentencing and Its Discontents: Cunningham v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]