Search for: "Cunningham v. California"
Results 61 - 80
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2013, 11:00 am
Certain other claims were dismissed.In Cunningham v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:53 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 6:12 am
Ngo which also dealt with the PLRA".
Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm
" Then, Chief Judge Lippman wrote that there is no material difference between the California statute struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]) "and our persistent felony offender sentencing statutes. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The opinion of the Court in California v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm
These facts easily supported both the assault and child-endangerment convictions.After Cunningham v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:41 pm
The primary issue before us is whether, in light of Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]), this sentencing scheme violates Apprendi and defendant's due process and Sixth Amendment rights. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:21 pm
The 2 remaining cases are Cunningham v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
The Ninth Circuit thus noted that only the Seventh and Eleventh Circuits in Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:31 am
The decision in a case called Cunningham v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:44 am
In Aryeh v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:01 pm
Sentencing and Its Discontents: Cunningham v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:49 pm
Cunningham v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:30 pm
This year’s case file, Karlson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 8:05 am
Cunningham v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
Wachovia, and Cunningham v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
Cunninham Issue (whether aggravated sentence violated Cunningham v. [read post]