Search for: "Cunningham v. California"
Results 101 - 120
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
In the wake of the turmoil, some faculty members have called for Chancellor Michael V. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 5:40 pm
Earlier today, the state Supreme Court took a closer look at 265 cases to see whether they were affected by Cunningham v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 7:21 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:12 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:48 pm
California and Rita v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
Last year in Cunningham v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 3:22 pm
After the Court's Cunningham v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 10:08 am
The California Supreme Court today has handed down two opinions to address an array of state sentencing issues following in the wake of the Supreme Court's Cunningham decision applying Blakely to California's sentencing scheme. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
Wachovia, and Cunningham v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
See Larkin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Moore, 648 P.2d 21, 24 (Okla. 1982); Cunningham v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:09 am
That is because the Apprendi majority has continued -- both in this Term's decision in Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 5:57 am
This whole process is not a way to define punishments under the offense, rather the Manual is defining elements as the Supreme Court has repeatedly said, and most recently in Cunningham v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
Cunningham . . . [read post]
29 May 2007, 7:51 am
UPDATE: Kent at Crime & Consequences here notes the VanDelft denial and also details that these sort of Blakely issues are up before the California Supreme COurt in the wake of Cunningham. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:22 am
(The closest example is probably Cunningham v. [read post]
