Search for: "Cunningham v. California"
Results 121 - 140
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:35 pm
Jensen Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
California. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Feb 26, 2007) (available for download below): The sky is not completely falling in California after Cunningham v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 7:50 am
Supreme Court Order List: If you make it past more than 35 pages of GVR's based on Cunningham v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:54 am
[Posted by Ron Wright] The Cunningham case settled the applicability of Blakely to the largest "hold-out" state, California. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:05 am
" The Court for the first time elaborated on that "reasonableness" standard last month, in the case of Cunningham v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:25 am
" This second piece has the title, "Justice Alito's Dissent in Cunningham v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 3:50 am
"Justice Alito's Dissent in Cunningham v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 1:45 pm
Finally, Don Thompson of the AP reports here that the California senate approved a bill that would change the state's sentencing scheme in the wake of the Court's ruling in Cunningham v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 1:37 am
.
Cunningham v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 10:21 pm
Thanks to Jonathan Soglin, I know that the California Supreme Court has now jumped into post-Cunningham action. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 10:00 pm
The case is Cunningham v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 5:57 pm
The California Supreme Court — acting only 16 days after the nation's highest court humbled it with Jan. 22's Cunningham v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:04 am
" Here is the set up:In this two-part series of columns, I will examine [Cunningham v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:27 am
If you don't know about Cunningham v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 6:53 pm
There’s been quite a stir in the blogosphere over the Supreme Court decision in Cunningham v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 4:44 pm
The core of her holding in Cunningham, however, is that the California Supreme Court misinterpreted California's sentencing laws. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
Cunningham provides a big boost in two areas of current and future Ninth Circuit rehearings en banc.In Cunningham, the Court addressed the California state sentencing system, which permits a sentence at the high end of a guideline based upon certain findings. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 5:55 am
V. [read post]
