Search for: "Cunningham v. California"
Results 161 - 180
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2007, 10:21 am
In Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:08 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in three cases Monday, including Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:50 am
Plus, prepare for an avalanche of post-Cunningham sentence appeals (and habeas petitions) in California. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:01 am
The Court's decision, Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:39 am
Thanks to this SCOTUSblog post, you can find the opinion of the Court in California v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The opinion of the Court in California v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
It starts with this notable sentence: "The California sentencing law that the Court strikes down today is indistinguishable in any constitutionally significant respect from the advisory Guidelines scheme that the Court approved in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:12 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the majority in Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the majority in Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:31 am
The decision in a case called Cunningham v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:47 am
I was hoping we might get a decision in Cunningham, the California Blakely cases, but now it appears this case is to take longer than Booker for SCOTUS to adjudicate (informed speculations here). [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:21 pm
The 2 remaining cases are Cunningham v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
The 2 remaining cases are Cunningham v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 9:15 pm
Though I am not expecting too much, Cunningham (on Blakely's applicability in California) and Burton (on Blakely's retroactivity) and James (on the impact of certain priors) could all be handed down relatively soon. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:07 pm
Cunningham could (and likely will?) [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
By granting review in yet another state sentencing case, California v. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
Though much can be said about the substance of the arguments--particularly Cunningham v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:10 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Wednesday in Cunningham v. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 1:36 pm
In Cunningham v. [read post]
