Search for: "Curran v. Department of Justice"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
Wilkie (17-4555) appeared first on Attig Curran Steel, PLLC. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 5:56 am
Guest Post By Connor Curran* Palomer v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Lefkowitz & Steven Menashi, Brief of Amici Curiae Former Justice Department Officials in Support of Petitioners in Zubik v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:19 pm
" Kumar v American Tr. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm
In the post ZXC v Bloomberg era, the reasoning behind the Department of Justice’s decision to create a criminal offence to protect the same interests, and to extend its applicability to a quarter of a century after death, remains opaque. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:20 am
Curran, 291 N.Y. 642 (1943). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
The Struthers Industries decision comes on the heels of EBSA’s success in Solis v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:08 pm
Harris v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Hildenbrand, No. 07-10210, 07-10211 Defendants' guilty plea convictions for defrauding the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) are affirmed over claims of error regarding the sufficiency of the factual resumes submitted in support of defendants' guilty pleas. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm
Even before the HITECH Act amendments, however, the Office of Civil Rights and Department of Justice already were stepping up HIPAA investigation and enforcement. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
The committee heard from The Sir Nicholas Wall P, Mr Justice Baker; Lord Neuberger MR and Mr Justice Tugendhat. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
Among other things, the HITECH Act amended HIPAA to: Allow a State Attorney General to sue health plans or other Covered Entities, business associates or both that harm state citizens by committing HIPAA violations after February 16, 2009; Expand the mandate by OCR to investigate violations and audit compliance with HIPAA; Require Office of Civil Rights to impose civil sanctions against Covered Entities and business associates involved in violations of HIPAA in accordance with tightened… [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Supreme Court, Nassau County, granted the preliminary injunction, and the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed. [read post]
