Search for: "Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith"
Results 61 - 80
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2021, 2:10 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway discussed new bipartisan legislation that would significantly improve transparency of international agreements. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:10 pm
Jack Goldsmith highlighted the new supplement available for his casebook with Curtis Bradley on foreign relations law. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 12:11 pm
” Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith argued that the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel’s test for unilateral uses of force provides no meaningful constraint on executive power. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
Jack Goldsmith argued that the most important part of the ruling was the Court’s sober analysis. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm
This position would be contrary to the traditional view, but it has gained at least some support since Professors Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith first articulated it in the late 1990s. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 8:21 am
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith discussed whether Congress cares that the president has an enormous amount of discretion to interpret international law. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway argued that the U.S. has not yet crafted an adequate system of oversight and accountability to govern its administrative regime for creating international agreements. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 12:15 pm
Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway argued that there are serious flaws in Congress’s ability to ensure accountability about executive agreements. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm
Jack Goldsmith announced the supplement to the new edition of Foreign Relations Law: Cases and Materials (6th Ed. 2017), the casebook he co-authored with Curtis Bradley. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith recount dozens of instances of Congress authorizing the use of force going back to the 1790s, while Harold Koh warned that the executive has been avoiding legislative constraints in foreign policy since Vietnam. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:02 am
Jack Goldsmith provided the most recent supplement to his treatise with Curtis Bradley, “Foreign Relations Law. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith concluded their three-part analysis of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith agreed in Lawfare with Halkbank’s interpretation of § 1604, arguing that the section’s “plain meaning” suggests it covers criminal as well as civil cases. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm
Here the more interesting question arises if one accepts the heretical view--put forward some years ago by Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith--that customary international law is law only as state common law. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:56 am
Bradley & Jack J. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 7:23 am
A second reason is that, as Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith have explained, “the executive branch has not organized itself internally to ensure that all agreements are deposited in a central location in the State Department. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:04 am
(For a more complete analysis of the below, see Chapter 10 of Jack Goldsmith and Curtis Bradley’s Foreign Relations Law or Bobby Chesney’s article “Who May Be Held? [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:42 pm
Jack Goldsmith, Harvard Law Session B: UN Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 2:15 p.m. [read post]
5 May 2009, 11:10 pm
" This claim repeats the claim of Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith in a recent op-ed complaining of a case challenging American and European companies who provided support to the Apartheid government in South Africa. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:46 am
Curtis Bradley and Lawfare's Jack Goldsmith argue against the bill, asserting that any erosion of state sovereign immunity privileges would be bad news for the United States, and that the proposed legislation “extends far beyond bilateral relations with one ally. [read post]
