Search for: "Cusimano v. Schnurr" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2015, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Deeming the Cusimanos' behavior in this regard suggests “forum-shopping,” the Court of Appeals concluded that under these circumstances, prejudice against Schnurr has clearly been established. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:00 am by John Diekman
Schnurr, NY Slip Op 05702 (1st Dept. 2014)Here is the decision.Tomorrow's issue:  A motion to vacate based on defective service. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” The plaintiffs’ evidence failed to raise a question of fact as to whether the limitations period contained in the letter agreements was tolled by the continuous representation doctrine (see Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d at 9; Cusimano v Schnurr, 137 AD3d 527, 531 [2016]; cf. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” The plaintiffs’ evidence failed to raise a question of fact as to whether the limitations period contained in the letter agreements was tolled by the continuous representation doctrine (see Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d at 9; Cusimano v Schnurr, 137 AD3d 527, 531; cf. [read post]