Search for: "Cyberleagle" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
The Cyberleagle blog has an article on the platform regulation in the context of the Online Safety Bill. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The Cyberleagle blog has an article on the five lessons that can be learnt from the French Constitutional Council’s decision to strike down the core provisions of Loi Avia, France’s equivalent of the German NetzDG law, and the relevance for the UK’s Online Safety Bill. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
The Cyberleagle blog has published twenty questions about the Online Safety Bill. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:57 am by INFORRM
From what feels like time immemorial the UK government has paraded its proposed online harms legislation under the banner of ‘What is Illegal Offline is Illegal Online’. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
The Cyberleagle blog has an interesting post: “How well do you know the Online Safety Bill? [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
With the promise that the OSB will return to the Commons next month, the Cyberleagle blog has published a refresher article summarising what is known about the Bill so far. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Cyberleagle has published a post on the most vulnerable aspects of the Online Safety Bill in light of last term’s delay, and discusses how the Bill might be reimagined under a new Prime Minister. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Cyberleagle blog has an article on the New Clause 14 in the Online Safety Bill, introduced before the Bill was put on pause until the Autumn, which stipulates how user-to-user providers and search engines should decide whether user content constitutes a criminal offence. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Strand 4 involves the creation of new and reformed criminal offences that would apply directly to users,  in parallel with the government’s proposals for an online duty of care, the Law Commission has been conducting two projects looking at the criminal law as it affects online and other communications: Modernising Communications Offences (Law Com No 399, 21 July 2021); Hate Crime Laws (LawCom No 402, 7 December 2021). [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Strand 4 involves the creation of new and reformed criminal offences that would apply directly to users,  in parallel with the government’s proposals for an online duty of care, the Law Commission has been conducting two projects looking at the criminal law as it affects online and other communications: Modernising Communications Offences (Law Com No 399, 21 July 2021); Hate Crime Laws (LawCom No 402, 7 December 2021). [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The most heavily debated aspect of the government’s proposals has been, Strand 2,  the ‘legal but harmful content’ duty. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
It is time – in fact it is overdue – to take stock of the increasingly imminent Online Safety Bill. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Cyberleagle has published a round-up of what is on the horizon for UK internet law, including the Online Safety Bill, EU Digital Services Act, the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill and the Investigatory Power Act review. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
This is Part 2 of a two part post dealing with a concrete example of the way in which the Online Safety Bill is should operate. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Graham Smith attempts to put what he considers to be a detrimentally-abstract draft Online Safety Bill onto more concrete footing on the Cyberleagle blog, with a hypothetical scenario involving an amateur blogger. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
One of the more intriguing aspects of the draft Online Safety Bill is the government’s insistence that the safety duties under the draft Bill are not about individual items of content, but about having appropriate systems and processes in place; and that this is protective of freedom of expression. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
One of the more perplexing provisions of the draft Online Safety Bill is its multi-level definition of legal but harmful content (“lawful but awful” content, to give it its colloquial name). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:50 am by INFORRM
Can something that I write in this blog restrict someone else’s freedom of expression? [read post]