Search for: "DAVIE v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 4,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2021, 5:53 am by ernst
Fish, University of California, Davis School of Law, has posted Race, History, and Immigration Crimes, which is forthcoming in the Iowa Law Review:The two most frequently charged federal crimes are immigration crimes: the misdemeanor of entering the United States without inspection, and the felony of reentering the United States after deportation. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dist., 28 NY3d 455, 465 [2016]; Davis v Isaacson, Robustelli, Fox, Fine, Greco & Fogelgaren, 284 AD2d 104, 105 [2001]). [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm by Michael Douglas
See too Re Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia [2019] Bus LR 1130 (CA); [2018] EWCA 2802. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Davis 21-109Issues: (1) Whether the States’ consent to suit in the bankruptcy courts, found to exist in Central Virginia Community College v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 5:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Magnant: Mich SCT Opinion Davis Brief Magnant Brief State Brief Magnant Reply Davis Reply Prior post here. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
United States of America v Tuggle – did establishing three CCTV cameras, encircling a man’s house for 18 months violate his privacy rights per the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:56 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
But Nugee LJ, persuaded by Ocado’s counsel, stated in obiter that the interference with a foreign court here was of a lesser extent. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]