Search for: "DAVIS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
So, as is often the case, the only remaining question was whether the school’s response was “clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances” such that it amounted to “deliberate indifference” under Davis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
So, as is often the case, the only remaining question was whether the school’s response was “clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances” such that it amounted to “deliberate indifference” under Davis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:31 am
It has been almost two years since the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Heller Ehrman v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 9:54 am
Ziff Davis), the court initially said the embeds were authorized by Instagram’s terms, but then it reversed itself on this issue. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
On 3 December 2020 William Davis J handed down judgment in the case of Stokoe Partnership Solicitors v Robinson & Ors [2020] EWHC 3312 (QB). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
Saul, 19-1442, and Davis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Schlunk decided by the Supreme Court of the US and Segers and Rufa BV v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The challengers in California v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
This second installment in our series on the upcoming legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in California v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
In recent times, the Supreme Court ruling in Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
See Soke v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
Davis, 885 F.2d at 522. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
