Search for: "DAVIS v. CALIFORNIA" Results 301 - 320 of 1,761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2014, 4:42 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 80519 (ED CA, June 10, 2014), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed, with leave to amend, a complaint by an inmate who is an adherent of Shetaut Neter who claims he is being denied a prayer rug, a religious diet, worship services, and religious programming on in-house television while he is in the special housing unit.In Davis v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 10:35 am by Steve Kalar
“The district court’s determination in this case that it lacked jurisdiction to reduce Davis’s crack sentence is consistent with” United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 9:20 pm
Anupam Chander (Univ. of California, Davis - Law) has posted Unshackling Foreign Corporations: Kiobel’s Unexpected Legacy (American Journal of International Law, forthcoming). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:14 am by Karen Gullo
Weighing in on one of the most important digital privacy rights cases of the year, EFF is asking the court to hear arguments in Davis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  At PrawfsBlawg, Miriam Baer comments on Thursday’s seven-two decision in Davis v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 12:34 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 210517 (ED CA, Dec. 21, 2017), a California federal magistrate judge recommended allowing a former inmate to move ahead with his complaint regarding a retaliatory cell search, but dismissed with leave to amend his complaint regarding damage to and confiscation of his prayer rug.In Davis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:33 am by ernst
  It is a preview of a longer version of the paper forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review in the spring, published now because of its relevance to New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:32 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 33393 (ED CA, March 11, 2013), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed, with leave to amend, an inmate's complaint that Buddhist inmates are being denied access to the chapel for services without a chaplain or custody officer present.In Davis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 6:30 am by Karen Tani
Williams (University of Auckland); Rachel Jean Baptiste (University of California, Davis). [read post]