Search for: "DAVIS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:00 am
In Hill v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm
Davis L. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Davis, 510 U.S. 1315, 1317 (1994) (Blackmun, J., in chambers) (citation omitted); Lugosch v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:57 pm
(Not that any of this likely practically matters much anyway since both sentences were in California. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:44 pm
Russo and Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” Minor v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Tooey v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 5:07 am
Seth Davis at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law (sethdavis@berkeley.edu). [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm
The Court affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s finding that the lawsuits against Amazon and its customers—Patreon, Vox Media, Dictionary.com, Vice Media, Oath, Inc., Buzzfeed, Popsugar and Ziff Davis—were barred in part by a 1907 Supreme Court ruling, Kessler v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm
" Hardy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:30 am
*New Case Law In the case of Aldea Dos Vientos v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Banister v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
I will then describe an important workaround, first described by Professor Darien Shanske of the University of California at Davis, that would allow the Federal Reserve to give assistance to states and cities without interference from Republicans in the Senate or the White House.Punishing One’s Own Troops: How Could a Crisis of This Magnitude Not Call for All Hands on Deck? [read post]
