Search for: "DAVIS v. LILLY"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
In this case, the Court of Appeals holds that the Act does not allow a woman to sue for discrimination that led to a reduced salary.The case is Davis v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
The use of prosecution history must support at least one of the two instances identified by Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:22 am
Kachina Pipeline Company v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 65 Va. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 1:28 pm
Davis, 2008 U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
by Dennis Crouch Eli Lilly and Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 11:58 am
An editorial in the Washington Post today argues that the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, the House bill designed to "blunt the impact" of the Ledbetter v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
There are two appeals in the Supreme Court beginning with Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company to be heard on Monday 18 to Wednesday 20 July 2011 by Lords Hope, Walker, Neuberger, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:27 am
Summary judgment was affirmed (Davis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:26 am
Eli Lilly and Company (1978) 87 Cal. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 8:29 pm
Teva Gemzar--Eli Lilly v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:45 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:28 am
Since the issue was actually and necessarily decided in the arbitration, in which CISEF had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue, CISEF and the other plaintiffs, who are admittedly in privity with it, are precluded from relitigating it herein (see Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co., 65 NY2d 449, 455 [1985]; Active Media Servs., Inc. v Grant Prideco, Inc., 35 AD3d 165 [2006]). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
The UCL debate on the UK Supreme Court decision Actavis v Eli Lilly ("Equivalents: K = Na. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 774 F.2d 830, 835 (7th Cir. 1985); Martinkovic v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
Lilly v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 394 F. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
PatLit features a guest post from Richard Kempner, Brian Whitehead and Stuart Jackson on the brace of recent Court of Appeals patent decisions (ConvaTec and Actavis v Lilly) which are currently preoccupying those good souls who spend their lives seeking to extract meaning from patent claims and descriptions. [read post]
