Search for: "DAWSON v. ANDERSON"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
" Anderson [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm
Ed. 2d 538 [page 1682] (1986), and observed that "the standard for granting summary judgment 'mirrors' the standard for judgment as a matter of law, such that 'the inquiry under each is the same'," citing Anderson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:54 am
Michelle Anderson, Professor of Law, Stanford Law School Juliet Moringiello, Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development and Professor of Law, Widener University, Commonwealth Law School John Pottow, John Philip Dawson Collegiate Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School David Skeel, S. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
(relisted after the May 21 conference) Anderson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 7:37 am
The 2016 Hoffman v L&M Arts case is a notable example of the delicate balance between personal privacy and the required transparency in the art market. [7] The main focal point of the case is the well-known Mark Rothko painting, called “Red Rothko” formerly owned by Marguerite Hoffman, the plaintiff. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:58 am
Anderson, 246 Ga. 786, 787 (272 S.E.2d 713) (1980). [read post]
