Search for: "DEPUY v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 7:37 am
Herlihy-Paoli stated that she felt severe pain after the Depuy Pinnacle hip was implanted in 2009. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 2:03 pm
DePuy et al February 25, 2013; Schlecker vs Depuy et al May 28, 2013; Cerney v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
In Kopitke v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
The case is Herlihy-Paoli v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
In Kopitke v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 6:22 pm
McCracken v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 12:35 pm
The case is Kransky v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:03 pm
See Barnes v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:59 pm
” The case is Kransky v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:08 am
The case is Herlihy-Paoli v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:43 pm
Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled on the issue in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
In Sazy v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
DePuy argued that plaintiffs’ state law design defect claims were preempted under Pliva v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
In Wier v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 1:25 pm
DePuy Orthopaedics, the Warsaw, Ind. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:33 am
And, though we have addressed this issue before here on Legal BLog (see DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuits, Preemption, And Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:43 am
In DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Looking at these, we'd have to say that Alabama (and the Eleventh Circuit) have just about the most favorable sales representative precedent of any state in the country.Anyway, here they are:Harper v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:30 am
See Powell, 663 F.3d at 1236-37; DePuy Spine, Inc. v. [read post]
