Search for: "DM v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2010, 2:06 am
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SM (Zimbabwe) v Same; AM (Zimbabwe) v Same; DM (Zimbabwe) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 1285; [2010] WLR (D) 295 “A claim for asylum would not be defeated if the tribunal found that a claimant would be willing to lie about political beliefs, or about the absence of political beliefs, but that the reason for the lie was to avoid persecution. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:04 am
” See Haimdas v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
First of all, the prosecutor's arguments on the motive issue were a fair response to defense counsel's extensive arguments that DM testified falsely due to his motivations as held in Layton v Phillips. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:51 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.] [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:20 pm
In Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:20 pm
United States, Fed. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 4:35 pm
In the case of Samuel v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 10:40 am
The 11th Circuit reissued Thompson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Atwood v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
It also found it telling that there was no proof of any amendment(s) filed with the state changing the business’s principal place of business to Nassau.And while there is a preference that cases be brought in the county where the accident occurred, absent a showing of any inconvenience to the witnesses, the AD1 thought the case should remain where it was originally brought.Everything sure has its place ….# # #DECISIONM v Lampert [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
Royalty Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 12:25 pm
Last Fall Steve posted about United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
Barclays Group, Case No. 10cv1012 DMS (BGS) (S.D. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:18 am
The BoA stated that accepting the Blücher catalogue as prior art would broaden the subject matter of the invalidity application and be inconsistent with Art. 63(2) Design Regulation.If compared with design No DM/059828 (and not with the Blücher catalogue), the contested design presented significant differences. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:16 pm
FWW does not enjoy uniform acceptance nationally under state wage and hour laws. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 4:59 am
Here is the complaint in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:19 pm
The Appeals Court explains that the M/V TINTOMARA, an ocean-going tanker, collided with the barge DM-932, in the tow of the M/V MEL OLIVER, splitting the barge in half and spilling its cargo of oil into the Mississippi River. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:54 am
In Petrofac, Inc., v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
In Doe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:34 pm
The Ninth Circuit jumped off the fence today, endorsing Bevill in United States v. [read post]
