Search for: "DOES 1 though 10 inclusive" Results 61 - 80 of 818
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 2:02 pm by Jason Rantanen
Though the sample size does not permit fine-grained comparisons, the basic finding – that US examiners are citing NPL far less frequently than PTAB judges or applicants – held across all technical centers.[1] These comparisons have their limits: in inter partes review, the challenger, not Examiner supplies the prior art, and the patents of IPR are not representative of patents in general. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Daniel Shaviro
Does one care about asset value changes in the past year, or only about current value? [read post]
7 May 2014, 9:38 pm
All three relate to the private copying exception which, as mentioned in the introduction, have been pulled.1. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:55 am by Colby Pastre
The following list, though not exhaustive, catalogues the major differences between the House and Senate tax reform bills. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  The inclusion of the additional field will allow the court to easily report the indigent status for each conviction. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:44 am by David Oxenford
Those factors include the following: (1) was the program regularly scheduled, (2) was the program content controlled by the station or program supplier, and (3) were the decisions as to the inclusion of candidates based on judgments as to the newsworthiness of the appearance and not for political purposes. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
Amusingly, the fortuitous inclusion exception is recognized by French courts, even though it is not recognized by law, and the Report stated just a few lines above that French law does not recognize judicial precedent. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as though fully set forth below. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as though fully set forth below. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:46 am by Robert Chesney
I would just ask that they tidy things up, using 1621(g)(1) to actually amend 10 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 2:50 pm by Chris Dreyer
Firm news can sometimes be a value-add for your readers, though. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:04 am by Jared Correia
But, even though encryption does often require at least one extra step, the benefit of securing your client’s data is worth it. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 6:52 am by Eric Goldman
The court correctly says “good faith” isn’t an element of 230(c)(2)(B), though it does show up in 230(c)(A). [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 5:09 pm
But I’m not wild about the court’s decision about the particular restrictions in play here. 1. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Dan Ernst
However, inclusion of a version of the paper on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) or similar pre-publication resource does not count as “publication” for purposes of this competition. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:02 pm by Daniel A. Kaplan
In addition, as explained by the Department of Labor (DOL) in its Fact Sheet #56C, where the bonus is truly “discretionary,” it is not subject to inclusion in the employee’s regular rate of pay and therefore does not affect overtime compensation calculations and liability. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As the law firm memo’s authors state, this decision does represent an “incremental victory” for those who advocate for the inclusion of these types of provisions in corporate bylaws as a way to forestall costly and burdensome shareholder litigation. [read post]