Search for: "DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT CO. v. BOUNDS"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
II Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
(09-1298) and Boeing Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The class’s impact extended beyond the geographic bounds of the properties in the class. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
One Douglas A-26B Aircraft, 662 F.2d 1372, 1374-75 n. 6 (11th Cir.1981) (to avoid redundancy, “misrepresentation” in Rule 60(b)(3) must encompass more than false statements made with intent to deceive). [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm
In Wynar v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Yet to insist that software defects and automobile defects should be governed by substantively similar legal regimes is to ignore the fact that “software” is a category comprising everything from video games to aircraft navigation systems, and that the type and severity of harms arising from software vulnerabilities in those products range dramatically. [read post]
