Search for: "DUKES v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 1,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am by James R. Copland
Dukes and that the EPA's governance of carbon-dioxide regulation under the Clean Air Act displaced the federal common law public nuisance suit brought by various states and municipalities in AEP v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 8:05 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Jailhouse phone call A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Miguel Duke of second degree murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, and possession of a regulated firearm by a disqualified person. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:56 pm by laborprof lpb
Beth Burch (Florida State) has posted on SSRN her introduction to the Dukes v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:28 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Dukes Supreme Court decision more narrowly than many had expected, surprising those who viewed Dukes (in concert with AT&T v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:37 am by Steven G. Pearl
The Supreme Court of the United States this morning granted Wal-Mart's petition for certiorari in Dukes v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:34 am by Joe Tort
In a long awaited decision to Wal-Mart's petition, the United States Supreme Court granted review in Dukes v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:23 am by Steven G. Pearl
The Supreme Court of the United States will decide in a private session tomorrow whether to grant the petition for certiorari filed by Wal-Mart in Dukes v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On Thursdsay, July 22, 2010 at noon, the State Bar's Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section will present a one-hour teleseminar, "The Potential Impact of Dukes on Class Certification in Antitrust and UCL Cases in the Ninth Circuit."  [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:51 pm by Howard Wasserman
Judge James Beaty of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina has denied, at least in part, the motions to dismiss in Evans v. [read post]