Search for: "Dalton v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Editor’s note: This post is republished with permission from the RLUIPA Defense blog which can be viewed here: http://www.rluipa-defense.com/home.cfm The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida has denied the City of Jacksonville’s motion to dismiss Church of Our Savior’s (formerly known as Resurrection Anglican Church) RLUIPA suit, and has scheduled the case for trial. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
When Ralls filed suit alleging violations of due process and the Administrative Procedure Act, President Obama himself issued a similar order demanding that Ralls divest and stating that he had “credible evidence” that Ralls’ actions might “impair the national security of the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Teva argues that the district court correctly determined that its response during prosecution of the '847 patent, where it stated that "[o]ne of ordinary skill in the art could understand that kilodalton units implies [sic] a weight average molecular weight," was not contradictory. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
., for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky: Central District of California James Asanuma, et al. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm by Jack McNeill
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
United States A judge has ruled that Rep. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]