Search for: "Damas v. State" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by jpfaff
And perhaps that is what actually happened; and if so, the Supreme Court’s majority is surely right that that is precluded by AEDPA and Jackson v Virginia. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm by Steve Davies
Thus, plaintiffs will be able to continue to possess animals, transport them within the state, or sell them to another party within the state without a permit. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That is, a client must establish "actual and ascertainable  damaes" (Boone v Bender, 74 AD3d 1111, 1112 [2010] [internal quotation marks and citations ommitted]; see Ehlinger v Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo, 304 AD2d 925, 926 [2003]) that would not have occurred "but for" the attorney's conduct (Boone v Bender, 74 AD3d at 1113; see Ulico Cas. [read post]
26 Jun 2005, 1:39 pm
According to the present technological state of the art, such a patina cannot be created artificially. [read post]