Search for: "Dan Brubaker" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2010, 10:44 pm by JD Hull
Inspired by Rich Brubaker at his All Roads Lead to China, Seattle-based Dan Harris writes about China corruption at his tirelesss China Law Blog. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 8:59 pm by Holden Oliver (Kitzb├╝hel Desk)
Seattle's Dan Harris has located "The Rules" over at Rich Brubaker's Shanghai-based All Roads Lead To China. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 7:59 am by Brooke
This week there's a wonderful range of reviews of interest for legal historians:In the London Review of Books is a review of Daniel Livesay's Children of Uncertain Fortune: Mixed-race Jamaicans in Britain and the Atlantic Family, 1733-1833.Kelly Lytle Hernadez's City of Inmates: Conquest, Rebellion, and the Rise of Human Caging in Los Angeles, 1771–1965 is reviewed in the Los Angeles Review of Books.At Books and Ideas is a review of… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:56 pm
Dan Harris at China Law Blog notes that "Foreign Companies In China Can't Get No Love" and Shanghai-based Rich Brubaker at All Roads Lead to China has this one: "Regulations in China: Are You Prepared? [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
Feinman has this post at the ACSBlog about the uncertain effect of the decision, while PrawfsBlawg's Dan Markel weighs in here. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 8:01 am
Cover Your Patents, a posting of Richard Brubaker of All Roads Lead To China, good advice including don't become complacent and be proactive: Cover Your Bases In China By Covering Your IPWednesday, August 30Richard Kuslan of Asia Business Intelligence has a short article about Dell Loses China Trademark Suit, and a request to send him the transcript of the judgment. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Move on to better criticisms, please [Darren McKinney, WSJ] Related: Federalist Society teleforum on mass tort bankruptcies with Steven Todd Brown, Ralph Brubaker, and Dan Prieto; “What should be the duty of public retailers whose customers have bizarre or offensive clothing, appearance, demeanor or behavior but do not actually engage in or threaten violence on the retailers’ premises? [read post]