Search for: "Dan Crane"
Results 41 - 60
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 11:31 am
Crane, Bargaining over Loyalty. 92 Tex. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:45 am
Dan Crane (Michigan) discusses Section 5 of the FTC Act and the Need for Guidelines. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:52 pm
The question in this case is whether such “reverse-payment” agreements are per se lawful (assuming the underlying litigation was not a sham and the patent not obtained by fraud), or instead presumptively anti-competitive and unlawful.To discuss the case, we have Dan Crane, who is a professor at the University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:52 pm
The question in this case is whether such “reverse-payment” agreements are per se lawful (assuming the underlying litigation was not a sham and the patent not obtained by fraud), or instead presumptively anti-competitive and unlawful.To discuss the case, we have Dan Crane, who is a professor at the University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
Daniel Sokol Dan Crane (Michigan) describes Bargaining Over Loyalty. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:57 pm
Mueller & Dan E. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 1:00 am
Daniel Sokol Dan Crane (Michigan) has written on Tying and Consumer Harm. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 9:08 am
Although this interview is from 2009, it gives you some insight into Google's over the top negotiation tactics and how they use the withholding of content as a negotiation tactic in the press (that Chris discussed in his commentary to Larry Crane's complaint about YouTube "apologizing" for taking his work). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
As for Crane, he was ultimately hanged, a result Jessica suggests resulted because the law was both "too republican and not republican enough"--that is, Crane was hanged for the murder of a common laborer despite his social standing, but he did not benefit from the later reform when Virginia created second-degree murder, with prison instead of hanging as punishment. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:30 am
Daniel Sokol Dan Crane (Michigan) has responded to the critique by Baker & Shapiro of Crane's writing on the continuity of merger enforcement between Bush and Obama administrations. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:30 am
Daniel Sokol Dan Crane (Michigan) has responded to the critique by Baker & Shapiro of Crane's writing on the continuity of merger enforcement between Bush and Obama administrations. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Daniel Sokol Jon Baker (American) and Carl Shapiro (Berkeley) have responded to Dan Crane with their short work (ie, you should read it because it is short) The Perils of Armchair Analysis: Evaluating Merger Enforcement During the... [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Daniel Sokol Jon Baker (American) and Carl Shapiro (Berkeley) have responded to Dan Crane with their short work (ie, you should read it because it is short) The Perils of Armchair Analysis: Evaluating Merger Enforcement During the... [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:27 am
Daniel Sokol Dan Crane (Michigan) asks Has the Obama Justice Department Reinvigorated Antitrust Enforcement? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:27 am
Daniel Sokol Dan Crane (Michigan) asks Has the Obama Justice Department Reinvigorated Antitrust Enforcement? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
But that’s not everything the Network has to offer on the subject, so be sure to check out or Affordable Care Act LXBN section for everything, which includes our LXBN TV interview today with Mintz Levin’s Thomas Crane. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
They also don’t seem to give much weight to the critiques set forth by Marvin Ammori, James Grimmelman, or Dan Crane regarding the incoherent and potentially counter-productive nature of “search neutrality” remedies. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
They also don’t seem to give much weight to the critiques set forth by Marvin Ammori, James Grimmelman, or Dan Crane regarding the incoherent and potentially counter-productive nature of “search neutrality” remedies. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:54 am
Others participating in this symposium include: James Grimmelman (NY Law); Eugene Volokh (UCLA); Marvin Ammori (Stanford Law); Mark Jamison (Univ. of Florida); Eric Clemons (Wharton School); Dan Crane (Michigan Law); and both Marina Lao and Frank Pasquale (Seton Hall); and more. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:00 am
Crane Would it be a good idea for antitrust law to require dominant Internet search engines to be “neutral” in listing their organic search hits, where “neutrality” would prohibit the search... [read post]
