Search for: "Dan Farber"
Results 21 - 40
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2022, 9:47 am
For a broad overview these types of cases, see great earlier posts by my Legal Planet colleagues Dan Farber and Richard Frank. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
On the other hand, I am quite taken with Professor Dan Farber’s appealing suggestion that the major questions doctrine should be viewed not as doing the work of the nondelegation doctrine, but as guarding against the potential that presidents might exercise powers not actually sanctioned in law. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm
"From Dan Farber (Berkeley Law) at LegalPlanet: "The Supreme Court’s Earliest Pollution Cases. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:15 pm
First, like Dan Farber explores in his symposium contribution, the Supreme Court’s new major questions doctrine was on my mind while reading the book. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:50 am
Mon, 10/24 Andrea Katz Tue, 10/25 Rick Pildes Wed, 10/26 Carlos Ball Thurs, 10/27 Victoria Nourse Fri, 10/28 Keith Whittington Mon, 10/31 Lisa Heinzerling Tue, 11/1 Glen Staszewski Wed, 11/2 Chris Walker Thurs, 11/3 Dan Farber Fri, 11/4 Gillian Metzger Mon, 11/7 Cristina Rodriguez Tue, 11/8 Michael Sant’Ambrogio Wed, 11/9 Ilya Somin Thurs, 11/10 Bijal Shah Fri, 11/11 Blake Emerson Andrea Scoseria Katz is Associate… [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 7:55 am
Dan Brouillette. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 5:57 am
(credit: Dan Farber) Amazon has accused the US Federal Trade Commission of harassing its top executives, including founder Jeff Bezos and chief executive Andy Jassy, as part of a probe into the ecommerce group’s Prime membership scheme. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Kosteckyj v Paramount Resources Ltd, 2022 ABCA 230 (CanLII) [75] There is no dispute that the governing test for constructive dismissal was established in Farber v Royal Trust Co, 1997 CanLII 387 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 846 [Farber], and solidified in Potter v New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10 [Potter]. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
Since 2005, I have assigned 85 books by 79 authors, with Sandy Levinson, Gerard Magliocca, Eric Segall, Dan Farber, Philip Hamburger, and David Bernstein each making 2 appearances. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Since 2005, I have assigned 85 books by 79 authors, with Sandy Levinson, Gerard Magliocca, Eric Segall, Dan Farber, Philip Hamburger, and David Bernstein each making 2 appearances. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
EPA, see Dan Farber's comments on Legal Planet.] [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
Farber discusses on the history of the war powers, as part of a series of posts on his book, Contested Ground: How to Understand the Limits of Presidential Powers (Volokh Conspiracy). [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
[The history isn’t unambiguous, but it leans toward expanding impeachment beyond criminal offenses.] [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
[History supports neither the plenary presidential power advocated by some nor the complete congressional dominance advocated by others.] [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
[A revival of the nondelegation doctrine isn’t likely to massively retrench either the scope of the regulatory state or the president’s ability to steer agency discretion.] [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:58 am
[Behind the technicalities of the appointment and removal power is a difficult tradeoff between democratic accountability and impartiality in implementing laws.] [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
[Political polarization inevitably warps our views of presidential actions, making an even-handed approach all the more crucial. ] Americans may be polarized today as never before in the past century. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:55 am
Dan Farber expertly guides readers through multiple aspects of the topic, including constitutional text, methods of constitutional interpretation, and the roles played by law, politics, and history. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
Today I'll take as my point of departure the amicus brief with which I'm most familiar--one filed on behalf of me and 12 other constitutional law scholars (Lee Bollinger, Erwin Chemerinsky, Sherry Colb, Dan Farber, Joanna Grossman, Leah Litman, Martha Minow, Jane Schacter, Suzanna Sherry, Geof Stone, David Strauss, and Larry Tribe).The core of our argument goes like this: Mississippi is plainly wrong in its contention that the abortion right has no connection to other… [read post]
